by dewittdj on Wed 03 Aug 2011 9:54 pm
It may be a stretch, but a federal judge (strong anti-gun type) hearing a case of someone CC onto a base [a.k.a. federal facility, federal installation, federal compound, federal encampment, federal jurisdiction, federal {fill in the blank}, etc.] might draw the line of reasoning that the entire area enclosed by the fence, signs posted at the gates [NO Privately Owned Firearms Allowed without permission of the Base Commander], countless hundreds, if not thousands, of government employees roaming freely about give them the authority to prosecute for violation of federal law.
Quid pro quo - You give up your 2A right for access to the federal facility, or so the "reasoning" goes.
D. DeWitt - MGySgt USMC (RET)
NRA Endowment Life Member,
Pistol, Rifle, and Shotgun Instructor,
RSO, WSA RSO, Rifle Expert, Pistol Expert,
Utah Concealed Firearm Permit Instructor,
UT CFP, AZ & ID CWP, SAF & JPFO LM, USPSA, IDPA,